Posts tagged liberal
Posts tagged liberal
Syrian ‘Rebels’ Fire Chemical Weapons At A Hospital…
New footage from September 3, 2013 shows militants from the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) using blue canisters/cylinders filled with an unknown gas mounted on top of shells fired on Syrian Army targets in different areas of Aleppo that are still under the control of the Syrian military.
1. Blurred Lines promotes rape, torture, animal abuse, etc.
2. Blurred Lines
3. Blurred Lines
4. Blurred Lines
5. Bic Pens
6. Dr. Who is a man.
7. Royal Baby was a boy
8. Some guy said something on Facebook
4,278,681. Women the Middle East being stoned to death,
4,278,682. Women living in poverty.
4,278,683. Women being beheaded in Middle East.
4,278,684. Other boring stuff about women being killed.
Obama’s blurred lines….
…we don’t have enough money in the military budget to allow the Blue Angels to perform or to give military members the 1% pay raise they were due…..
….but we do have enough money to bomb Syria.
How does that work?
Another Colorado Democrat has stoked the state’s raging gun-control debate by challenging the argument that guns are needed for self-defense.
Colorado House Majority Leader Dickey Lee Hullinghorst said in an interview on YouTube last week that firearms ownership is redundant because the state Legislature keeps citizens safe from harm.
“As a woman, I have the right not to carry a gun and to feel safe on the streets, and that’s what we provide for in the state Legislature is for all of us in the state of Colorado — to feel safe on the streets without having to carry a gun,” said Mrs. Hullinghorst on “The Tim Caffrey Show.”
She also took a swipe at gun owners.
“The thought that the only way we can protect ourselves is to wield our own weapon is completely absurd and an argument that I absolutely discount as frivolous,” Mrs. Hullinghorst said.
That train of thought is the major malfunction and disconnect from reality that most anti-gun people have: the idea that laws will keep people safe.
Their mistake is in their belief that criminals follow the law. You can write up laws all day long but criminals will not follow them…that’s why they’re called criminals.
The only people who follow laws, and who will be disarmed by gun laws, are law abiding citizens who don’t commit crimes with guns to begin with. So, by passing laws restricting weapons, the only people without guns will be the same people who don’t commit crimes with them…leaving all of the guns in the hands of criminals.
It’s not that hard to fathom…which is probably why Democrats don’t get it.
…went on a radio show this morning and they were talking about Obama requesting authorization to strike Syria from Congress.
She expressed doubt that, at this time anyway, Obama will receive authorization at which time the radio host asked if it would be a good idea if Obama attacked Syria after being denied authorization from Congress.
She replied by saying that Obama would “be in real trouble” if he did that since no previous President has launched an attack after being denied authorization by Congress.
But then she added this kicker.
She said that if Obama ignores Congress and does attack Syria he could still be saved and “it’ll be because of loyalty of Democrats. They just don’t want to see him shamed and humiliated on the national stage.”
She then dropped them ringer:
"At the, at the moment, that’s the only reason I would vote for it if I could vote on it."
So she’d vote to have our military strike another country for no reason other than she doesn’t want Obama to be shamed and humiliated on the national stage.
Not because it’s the right thing to do or because it’s justified but only because she doesn’t want Obama to look bad.
1.Bush in Iraq: Attacked an evil regime isolated for over a decade by both Democrats and Republicans.
Obama in Syria: Wants to attack an evil regime coddled for six years by Democrats and the White House.
2.Bush in Iraq: Attacked after UN inspectors turned away, in violation of Security Council resolutions.
Obama in Syria: Announced plans to attack before any inspections, and in fact opposed UN inspections.
3.Bush in Iraq: Attacked after UN Security Council deadlocked on authorization for use of force.
Obama in Syria: Has not attempted to obtain UN Security Council authorization for use of force.
4.Bush in Iraq: Attacked after building multinational “coalition of the willing” with Britain.
Obama in Syria: Plans to attack without multinational coalition and after British rejection of war.
5.Bush in Iraq: Sought authorization from Congress first, before going to UN or planning any attack.
Obama in Syria: Opposed authorization from Congress until “red line” & attack were already announced.
6.Bush in Iraq: Attacked Iraq as part of War on Terror against Al Qaeda and affiliated groups.
Obama in Syria: Says “War on Terror” is over, is arming Islamist groups allied with Al Qaeda.
7.Bush in Iraq: Clear objectives, including regime change to replace dictatorship with democracy.
Obama in Syria: No clear objectives, formal opposition to any direct effort at regime change.
8.Bush in Iraq: Acted before Saddam Hussein could threaten neighbors or his own people.
Obama in Syria: Acting after Bashar al-Assad has slaughtered 100,000 Syrians, threatened neighbors.
9.Bush in Iraq: Attacked after moving strategic U.S. military assets to the region to protect U.S. allies.
Obama in Syria: Acting after “pivot to Asia,” after military sequester, and despite risks to allies.
10.Bush in Iraq: Gave up golf for the rest of his presidency while U.S. troops still in combat.
Obama in Syria: Went golfing (again) after announcing new Syria policy.
..and called it “Rose of the desert”.
The glowing article praised the Assads as a “wildly democratic” family-focused couple who vacation in Europe, foster Christianity, are at ease with American celebrities, made theirs the “safest country in the Middle East,” and want to give Syria a “brand essence.”
Strangely enough, when Syria fell under the boorish glare of the Obama administration, the butt kissing article vanished.
Nothing says journalistic integrity like a little ‘1984’ style Ministry of Truth tactics in an attempt to try and not walk around with egg on your face.
MSNBC’s resident idiot and closet dweller, Chris Hayes, obviously thinks his show is just chock full of ‘Amazing’.
What’s really amazing is how this limp noodle manages to stay on the air.
Hey, Chris! Pull out a thesaurus and learn a new word or two, you lazy trash humper.
Only 2 percent of Democrats use MSNBC as their primary news source, and only 1 percent of U.S. adults overall watch the liberal network for breaking updates on current events, a Gallup poll finds.
So how do these screeching baboons stay on the air then?
Yesterday, the White House released a photo of the Child King and his court inside the situation room and, supposedly, discussing the overthrow of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
A CBS News reporter noticed the very curious absence of the US Secretary of State, John Kerry, from the gaggle on sycophants bumbling around the table and went looking for him and, maybe not so surprisingly, found him on his wife’s yacht.
When the State Department was asked about where Kerry was, they reacted in the typical Obama Administration fashion….they lied.
But the State Department said Kerry was not aboard a boat on Wednesday and has spent the day working the phones on Egypt. “Since his plane touched down in Washington at 4 a.m., Secretary Kerry was working all day and on the phone dealing with the crisis in Egypt,” spokeswoman Jen Psaki said.
Unfortunately for them, another reporter had the common sense to visit the playground of the well-off and took a picture of Kerry working the State Department hotline…and when I say ‘State Department hotline’ I mean playing on his yacht.
Again, in using the typical Obama Playbook when caught in an “oops”…and when I say ‘oops’ I mean a lie…the State Department responded by saying, “oh…well…uh…okay. Yeah, he was on his yacht but only ‘briefly’.”
Where Kerry was isn’t so important. But the fact that the State Department lies so facilely, and has absolutely no compunction about doing so, does matter.
Of course, “briefly” is another way, again of trying to minimize, when it would appear it was not “brief” at all.
It is why they believe they can get away with lying over matters of great significance, like Benghazi.
But that was yesterday. Today is a new day and, you’d think, our leaders would learn from their mistakes and turn their attention to the matters that they get paid to pay attention to.
Not so much when it comes to people who work for the Obama Administration.
Mosheh, a CBS Producer, saw Kerry on the boat again today.
Likely, it was only “briefly” and doubtless, he is working on Egypt as he steers the boat his wife inherited from her dead husband.
CONGRESSMAN PETE SESSIONS (R-TEXAS): What we’re trying to accomplish is to end eligibility of food stamps that compete against those families, those needy families that we talked about, for rapists, pedophiles and murderers. Whether rapists, pedophiles or murderers will be eligible. But it’s pedophiles, murderers, rapists, those who have, should have enough money.
What he really said:
SESSIONS: The President’s inability to lead is what is causing this country to have massive unemployment and a GDP rate of about 1.5 percent. It is a nightmare for people.
So I do understand that we have those in our midst who are in trouble. I don’t think this bill is ever aimed at, and we shouldn’t try and say that it would be aimed at, the disabled, mothers with children. That’s not what we’re trying to accomplish here. What we’re trying to accomplish is to end eligibility of food stamps that compete against those families, those needy families that we talked about, for rapists, pedophiles and murderers. That’s why you see members of the Democratic Party coming down here today and they’re saying we’re going to take it away from other people. No – rapists, pedophiles, and murderers.
MSNBC is a network full of shameless idiots who treat both of their viewers like they’re stupid.
But then…anyone who watches MSNBC and takes them seriously is stupid.