The watchdog who tracks the billions of taxpayer dollars spent to rebuild Afghanistan says government officials have tried to silence him because they think he’s embarrassing the White House and Afghan President Hamid Karzai by pointing out the waste and fraud.
Most transparent administration ever!!
The 3am phone call came on September 11, 2012….and both Hillary and Obama ignored it.
American Middle East analysts often claim that Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood is a moderate organization, nothing like the more radical Salafis. If true, what do we make of the fact that the most intolerant, anti-American, hate-filled Salafis and jihadis also happen to be the greatest and staunchest supporters of Morsi? Doesn’t such unequivocal support indicate shared ideologies and goals?
Consider: A few weeks ago, while discussing the ongoing protests against Egypt’s President Muhammad Morsi—himself a leader of the Brotherhood—Sheikh Abdullah Badr, an Al Azhar trained scholar and professor of Islamic exegesis, made the following assertion on live TV:
“I swear to Allah, the day those who went out [to protest], and at their head, the [Coptic] Christians—I say this at the top of my voice—the day they think to come near Dr. Morsi, I—we—will pop their eyes out, and the eyes of all those who support them, even America; and America will burn, and all its inhabitants. Be assured, the day Dr. Morsi is touched by any hand whichever, and connected to whomever, by Allah it will be the last day for us. We will neither leave them, nor show them any mercy.”
Such a peaceful and religious people. Aren’t you glad Obama decided to support them, give them money and weapons and take them on as advisers?
Oh, there’s nothing to worry about with such pious people as this as our ‘allies’.
—
Barack Obama in a speech shortly after the Benghazi attack in which he vowed to bring the terrorists “to justice”.
In unrelated news: Two years later, new reports indicate:
The Ansar al Sharia Brigade, the Islamist terror group linked to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, continues to operate freely in that Libyan city, according to U.S. military officials.
The group remains active in the Mediterranean port city, operating patrols and checkpoints, and earlier this year reached an agreement with other Islamist groups allowing it to operate openly, said military officials familiar with intelligence reports from North Africa.
So much for ‘bringing those folks to justice”. But then, that vow did come from Obama’s mouth so we should have known it was a lie from the get-go.
Thanks, Obama!
From Daily Beast:
The volatile country, still reeling after the Benghazi attack and several recent bombings, has become a magnet for al Qaeda terrorists determined to sow instability in the region.
“Libya has become AQIM’s headquarters,” says the intelligence source, adding that in just the last few weeks three new al Qaeda camps have opened in southern Libya.
In his usual short-sightedness, Obama was part of the circumstances that have led to a resurgence of al-Qaeda and has not only allowed, but also supported, the cause of radical Islam within the Middle East.
On March 15, 2011, Obama took the podium and announced to the world that he had authorized US Military action in Libya.
“Today I authorized the armed forces of the United States to begin a limited military action in Libya,” Obama. “That action has now begun.”
A few months later, Hillary Clinton found it to be pretty hilarious when she received word that the Libyan dictator, Muammar Qaddafi, had been beaten to death and drug through the streets.
“We came, we saw, he died,” she laughed when told of news reports of Qaddafi’s death by an aide in between formal interviews.
And what was the result of their chuckle-worthy actions? The murder of four Americans in Benghazi and the establishment of terror training camps in a previously somewhat secure country and the return of al-Qaeda.
Just like the return of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, who has spawned and supports terror organization to this date, Obama has not only supported but facilitated the return of vocal enemies of America and, even now, is planning on arming known terrorists, and lay the groundwork for future terror training facilities and bases of operations in Syria.
Providing aid and comfort to our enemies is no longer treasonous under the Obama administration but is, instead, well practiced policy.
Possible future votes trump American citizen’s safety according to the Obama administration.
From The Daily Caller:
In part three of three of his six-part interview with The Daily Caller, National ICE Council president Chris Crane explained what President Obama’s actions on immigration and blind eye to illegal immigration has made it nearly impossible for ICE agents to enforce the law.
“We can’t have Presidents of the United States picking and choosing which laws will and will not be enforced.” Crane said.
Crane went on to explain how President Obama’s de facto repeal of immigration enforcement has led to serious and dangerous criminals being set free. “What the Obama Administration has ICE agents now doing is we now go into jails and prisons looking for illegal aliens inside of those facilities who have committed and been convicted of crimes. So we apply the Dream Act not to kids, in schools, but to adult inmates and have to ask them basically ‘Do you qualify for President Obama’s Dream Act?’ When they tell us ‘Yes we qualify’ we can’t even require them to give us any kind of proof, a transcript, or anything like that. We can’t detain them for investigation to substantiate the claims, we simply have to release them to the street. They walk out the back door of the jail as ‘Dreamers.’ There is nothing we can do about that.”
While it should be no surprise to anyone who has been following the Benghazi fiasco, this should be another indicator that Obama and his crew do not give two licks for the safety of the American people. Just like Obama left four Americans to be murdered in Libya for no apparent reason other than it would contradict his ‘al-Qaeda is on their heels” statement and cost him votes during the 2012 election, Obama is willing to jeopardize the safety of Americans for no reason other than generating votes and a positive image in the Hispanic community.
Besides his habit of choosing what laws he will enforce, while ignoring others that will not benefit him during elections, he is now willing to release convicted criminals back out on the streets…even though those criminals are here illegally to begin with.
But he has ‘swag’ and hangs with Jay-Z so it’s all good, I guess.
…You know, to make sure everyone “pays their fair share”.
Because so many 1%ers do their shopping online.
—
A notice posted on the Facebook page ”Foreigners in the Syrian Revolution” in reference to the death of Khalid al-Suwid, who died fighting for the Syrian ‘rebels’ after being released from a Saudi Arabian prison after spending two years in jail for fighting alongside terrorists in Iraq and had ‘graduated’ from the kingdom’s well-regarded rehabilitation program for religious extremists.
And these are the people Obama, McCain and the other imbeciles are thinking of arming and sending US troops to fight alongside.
Dem Congressman confirms that White House talking points on Benghazi were “completely false”.
Or to put it in layman’s terms, they were lying.
On September 14, just three days after the attack in Benghazi, Breitbart News published a story titled “Pattern of Targeting Diplomats in Benghazi Should Have Been Warning.” The same day that story went up, the State Department and the White House were working to remove identical information from their Benghazi talking points.
There was a clear pattern of attacks on western targets in Benghazi in the five months leading up to the 9/11 attack. I highlighted four attacks which had been barely reported, mostly in British news sources:
- A bomb thrown at the convoy of the head of the UN Mission to Libya during a visit to Benghazi.
- An RPG fired at the Red Cross HQ in Benghazi in May.
- A bomb thrown over the fence of our consulate on June 6.
- An RPG fired at the convoy of the British ambassador a week later, also in Benghazi.
Obviously, a pattern of attacks on diplomats and western interests suggests an attack on our consulate is not an outlier and probably not the result of a spontaneous protest. As I wrote at the time:
All of the previous attacks on diplomats and western outposts in Benghazi took place before the film, Innocence of Muslims, was uploaded to You Tube. There is ample reason to think the attack would have happened with or without the pretext of the film.
Incredibly, it turns out the same day the pattern of attacks story went up the Obama administration was busy removing any mention of the same attacks from their Benghazi talking points. Here is what the talking points said on the morning of the 14th according to a new report by the Weekly Standard:
Since April there have been at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi by unidentified assailants, including the June attack against the British ambassador’s convoy. We cannot rule out the individuals has [sic] previously surveilled the U.S. facilities, also contributing to the efficacy of the attacks.
By the next day, all of that information had been removed. Why? According to the Weekly Standard, the State Department was worried it would be criticized.
an individual identified in the House report only as a “senior State Department official” responded to raise “serious concerns” about the draft. That official, whom The Weekly Standard has confirmed was State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland, worried that members of Congress would use the talking points to criticize the State Department for “not paying attention to Agency warnings.”
In an attempt to address those concerns, CIA officials cut all references to Ansar al Sharia and made minor tweaks. But in a follow-up email at 9:24 p.m., Nuland wrote that the problem remained and that her superiors—she did not say which ones—were unhappy. The changes, she wrote, did not “resolve all my issues or those of my building leadership,” and State Department leadership was contacting National Security Council officials directly. Moments later, according to the House report, “White House officials responded by stating that the State Department’s concerns would have to be taken into account.” One official—Ben Rhodes, The Weekly Standard is told, a top adviser to President Obama on national security and foreign policy—further advised the group that the issues would be resolved in a meeting of top administration officials the following morning at the White House.
Notice that cutting references to Ansar al Sharia was not enough. What Nuland, and her unnamed superiors, wanted was the removal of any information about prior attacks. So all that was left was the claim of a spontaneous demonstration with no antecedents.
It wasn’t that the administration was unaware of the pattern of prior attacks in Benghazi. It’s that they didn’t want anyone else to be aware of them.
And we also recognize that most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come from the United States. I think many of you know that in America, our Constitution guarantees our individual right to bear arms, and as president, I swore an oath to uphold that right and I always will.
“But at the same time, as I’ve said in the United States, I will continue to do everything in my power to [pass] common-sense reforms that keep guns out of the hands of criminals and dangerous people, that can save lives here in Mexico and back home in the United States. It’s the right thing to do.
"—
Barack Obama during a recent speech in Mexico
He continued by saying, “And to our job creating friends in the drug cartels, don’t worry. Eric Holder and I vow to continue supplying weapons to you while blaming it on redneck Americans.”
In unrelated news, STRATFOR addressed this “most of the guns come from the US” myth in 2011.
As we discussed in a previous analysis, the 90 percent number was derived from a June 2009 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report to Congress on U.S. efforts to combat arms trafficking to Mexico (see external link).
According to the GAO report, some 30,000 firearms were seized from criminals by Mexican authorities in 2008. Of these 30,000 firearms, information pertaining to 7,200 of them (24 percent) was submitted to the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) for tracing. Of these 7,200 guns, only about 4,000 could be traced by the ATF, and of these 4,000, some 3,480 (87 percent) were shown to have come from the United States.
This means that the 87 percent figure relates to the number of weapons submitted by the Mexican government to the ATF that could be successfully traced and not from the total number of weapons seized by Mexican authorities or even from the total number of weapons submitted to the ATF for tracing. In fact, the 3,480 guns positively traced to the United States equals less than 12 percent of the total arms seized in Mexico in 2008 and less than 48 percent of all those submitted by the Mexican government to the ATF for tracing.
This means that almost 90 percent of the guns seized in Mexico in 2008 were not traced back to the United States.
I’d rather get kicked in the balls with a rusty, spike tipped metal boot, Barry, but, hey…thanks for asking!
—
B-Rock Obama commenting on Obamacare during a recent press conference
This is an even bigger load of lies than usual from this lying ass liar. My insurance company already informed us back in January that, due to Obamacare, our insurance premiums were going up and, once all the regulations (which even they did not know what they would all be) go into effect then our insurance would become “unsustainable” and we would end up losing it.
You people that bought into the “free healthcare” lie are dumber than a box of rocks.
President Obama is preparing to send lethal weaponry to the Syrian opposition and has taken steps to assert more aggressive U.S. leadership among allies and partners seeking the ouster of President Bashar al-Assad, according to senior administration officials.
So Obama is pushing to provide weapons to the Syrian ‘rebels’….which are known to be polluted with members of al Qaeda and other Islamic radical terror groups.
I could have sworn I read somewhere something about providing aid and comfort to our enemies….now where could that have been?
Well, isn’t that interesting?
From the Washington Free Beacon:
Muslim extremists with ties to al Qaeda have been using Massachusetts and the city of Boston as a jihadi headquarters since at least 1993, according to a recent report by a top terrorism analyst.
At least 26 residents were found to have ties to al Qaeda, according to the report by the Henry Jackson Society. The activity dates from before the Tsarnaev brothers, radical Muslim immigrants to the United States, were identified as the suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing.
Jihadist activity has taken place in Massachusetts since at least 1993 and includes in-state fundraising for terrorism, “those convicted of planning jihad, and even those who have been killed while fighting abroad,” according to the report by terrorism analyst Robin Simcox.
“The city [of Boston] and state of Massachusetts has a long history of ties to AQ [al Qaeda] and AQ-inspired militancy,” the report states.
“Even prior to last week’s Boston bombing, there had been twenty six individuals with links to Massachusetts connected to AQ [al Qaeda] and AQ-inspired terrorism,” the report states. “Fifteen had lived in Massachusetts, with eleven 9/11 hijackers using the Boston area as a temporary base from which to launch their attacks.”
Good thing Obama took the advice of the Muslim Brotherhood and their lapdog organization, CAIR, which directed Obama to scrub any reference to jihad and Islamic Terror from policy and training materials. And, even better for them, that idiot bowed down and made it policy.
What could go wrong?
But keep your blinders on, people. Nothing to see here and besides….we have a gay basketball player now!!
Breaking through the progressive fog with a dirty spoon. Making posts detailing the Progressive Left's attempt to ruin our country, outing the Islamist extremist agenda and calling out the Apologists for the naive idiots they are. I stand with Israel and its people.
